ATO targeting false invoicing schemes

Fake invoice schemes targeted by ATO

ato targeting false invoicing

The Serious Financial Crime Taskforce (SFCT) led by the ATO is warning businesses against using illegal financial arrangements such as false invoicing to avoid their tax obligations or inflate their deductions.

The SFCT was established in 2015 as a collaborative effort between various law enforcement and regulatory agencies, including the ATO, Australian Federal Police, Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission, and Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

 

Duplicate the above container for more 2 column sections OR Duplicate the below container for 1 column text only sections. (DON’T FORGET TO DELETE THIS CONTAINER)

The taskforce aims to address the most complex and detrimental forms of financial crimes, such as fraud, tax evasion, and money laundering by employing a unified approach that combines expertise, intelligence-sharing, and advanced technological methods.

Since its inception, the SFCT has made substantial progress in reducing the impact of serious financial crime in Australia, as evidenced by successful audits, investigations, and prosecutions that have led to significant convictions and the recovery of large sums of money.

Fake invoicing arrangements

Currently, the SFCT is turning its attention to some businesses that are using false invoicing arrangements where no goods or services are provided. Most commonly, these arrangements have the following features:

  • an entity (usually a promoter of the scheme) issues invoices to a legitimate business but no goods or services are provided;
  • the business pays the invoices, by cheque or direct transfer, and the promoter returns most of the amount paid to the owners of the business in cash;
  • the promoter keeps a small amount as a commission;
  • the business then illegally claims tax deductions and GST input tax credits from the false invoice;
  • the owners of the business use the cash they have received for private purposes or to pay cash wages to workers and amounts are not properly reported in their tax returns.

The ATO and the AFP have already executed search warrants at 7 residential and business properties in various Sydney suburbs in relation to an investigation into a Sydney-based cheque-cashing entity suspected of false invoicing.

The suspected criminal operation is believed to have laundered money for about 1,200 businesses from a range of industries and laundered more than $1 billion to facilitate tax fraud.

In further examples cited by the SFCT, it is made clear that businesses that use these types of arrangements are either caught by data-matching which may indicate anomalies in expenses compared to previous periods, or from tip-offs from the general public.

Businesses that have been persuaded to enter into these types of arrangements by promoters are encouraged to make a voluntary disclosure to the ATO which may reduce penalties involved.

Penalties resulting from investigations by the SFCT can be severe, reflecting the serious nature of the financial crimes being addressed.

Consequences of participating in fake invoicing schemes

The consequences for individuals and entities found guilty of serious financial crimes can include:

  • criminal charges which may lead to convictions and prison sentences
  • financial penalties such as fines
  • confiscation of proceeds of crime which may involve assets
  • recovery of unpaid taxes including interest and penalties

Promoter penalties

Businesses involved in promoting these schemes may be subject to the promoter penalty laws, which are not only restricted to widely offered schemes.

Promoter penalties can apply in cases where there is only one client in the arrangement.

Penalties under the promoter penalty laws range from voluntary self-correction to the imposition of civil penalties of up to 5,000 penalty units for an individual (currently equating to $1,565,000) or 25,000 penalty units for a company (currently equating to $7,825,000).

It is important to note that specific penalties imposed will depend on the details of each case and the discretion of the courts.

Disclaimer: The information on this page is for general information purposes only and is not specific to any particular person or situation. There are many factors that may affect your particular circumstances. We advise that you contact Mathews Tax Lawyers before making any decisions.

Scroll to Top